All communities like goodreads start off the same way: people who genuinely love that thing – reading in this case – make a site what it is. They choose to make a site ‘the one’, they build it up with love and vast amount of unpaid labour and then the people who kick it off lose sight of what it is – or it was never more to them than a way to make money out of other people’s good nature. One way or another they become huge, filled with people who aren’t actually interested, but make up the all important numbers and before you know it Amazon has become the owner of it, you, your writings, your community.
Back before this happened, I wrote this, instigated by Paul Bryant one of the genuinely talented people who work as slave labour for Amazon.
Well, it got you a lot of votes, Paul Bryant. That weary cynical review of this book. The one you ended:
It was a bad idea, rereading a book which so knocked me out all those years ago. I’ll give it 5 stars for the love I used to have for it, but I don’t really recommend it to anyone now. The world has changed and no longer has the stomach for Ray Bradbury’s 1950s goldenhued renderings of his own 1920s childhood. So goodbye, then, to Dandelion Wine, another one I loved.
What I learned from this book is that Memory Lane has been mined. You walk down that street at your peril.
But it was bullshit.
The world hasn’t changed. You have. Or you were never the person you thought you were. Dashes back to check. Fuck. I voted for your review. I can’t believe I did that. I’m so impartial it makes me sick.
Ray Bradbury is a man who believe that life should be lived thus: “Jump off the cliff and build your wings on the way down.” He has never stopped believing that, never stopped living that. Maybe you have, Paul. Or maybe it’s a mask for votes and you aren’t really like that at all. But IF you have, not everybody has!!!
It is all very well, one might argue, for a writer to say that. He isn’t going to fall very far, is he? But imagine. Please, just imagine. Imagine deciding to become a writer. Imagine, further, deciding to become a writer in a new genre which is scorned in its infancy, if not perhaps now too. What a wild thing to do. Wild, crazy, dangerous, insane thing to do. If that isn’t jumping off a cliff while figuring out how to build your wings on the way down, I don’t know what is.
And never, not for one moment, has Ray Bradbury lost what it is that makes him this amazing person, who is what he writes, whose writing is what he is. Can I put ‘amazing’ in 40 pt font there? And if he still believes, utterly, completely, in what he is, in his craft, in what he has to say, in the effect it has, why should we not? I haven’t stop believing in it for one second and I couldn’t imagine a more proper way to live than by his advice.
Why do children admire sportsman? Because they fuck supermodels? George Clooney says, ‘no, that’s why grownups admire them. Children admire them because they live their dreams.’ You can live your dreams. Ray Bradbury is lots of things. Exquisite writer, fabulous ideas man, a fighter for things that matter. But above all he had a dream as a kid and he has lived that dream every day of his life, EVERY day, and never lost sight of what it is he has done.
I keep wanting to yell ‘amazing’. I don’t know what else to say. He helped make me as a kid and I, for one, won’t ever back off from that.
Update, 5 Feb 2011: It has arrived. Something Wicked for Paul. I’m going to start it today.
Update, 13 February 2011:
By the pricking of my thumbs
Something wicked this way comes.
He is the ghost of goodreads, stalking authors, turning their books into false memories, making ordinary folk on goodreads afeared of their memories, not trusting them. He is a gummity ghost, large of girth, which he claims is his love of food, but his food isn’t ordinary folks’ food, he feeds on the fears he creates in others. Boys aren’t like that. Boys weren’t like that. I thought I was like that but I wasn’t.
Oh but you were, gummity Paul Bryant. You were. That’s the whole point. You couldn’t write that review unless you were exactly the boy that Bradbury preserves. Boys were like that. Boys are probably still like that despite the best efforts of political correctness to make them non-boys.
Then there are the tired, old parents who can’t stand the idea that this is true.
Then there are obstinate people, I hope, who will fight you to the death on this point. You have done me a great favour, making me reread this book. I’d forgotten how I measure books. I’d forgotten that thing you do, glance at the page, not taking in a word and yet what is there calls you in, it pulls you to it. Hauntingly beautiful patterns. I got such a shock when it did that to me the other day, suddenly remembering how I used to do this with all books and how most of them fail.
You may diminish this to the level of overcooked eggs, but it isn’t. It is prose poetry that says things long and says things short too. Will and Jim are sent to bed without their dinner.
The boys threw themselves on their separate beds in their separate houses, probed mattresses for chocolate chunks put away against the lean years, and ate moodily.
This made me laugh out loud at the doctor yesterday. Boys, summed in a couple of dozen words, frozen in the ice of them, as Bradbury might have it.
Boys have never be known to go straight up to houses to ring bells to summon forth friends. They prefer to chunk dirt at clapboards, hurl acorns down roof shingles, or leave mysterious notes flapping from kits stranded on attic window sills.
True words. Now, it could be that they will never be true again. Maybe turning boys into non-boys, maybe the internet, mobile phones, the trappings of technology will mean boys are never boys again. (Surely not.) But that doesn’t make what Bradbury writes here false.
I’m guessing this is you, Paul Bryant, Will’s father in the dead of night:
Three in the morning, thought Charles Halloway, seated on the edge of his bed. Why did the train come at that hour?
For, he though, it’s a special hour. Women never wake then, do they? They sleep the sleep of babes and children. But men in middle age? They know that hour well. Oh, God, midnight’s not bad, you wake and go back to sleep, one or two’s not bad, you toss but sleep again. Five or six in the morning, there’s hope, for dawn’s just under the horizon. But three, now, Christ, three A.M.! Doctors say the body’s at low tide then. The soul is out. The blood moves slow. You’ve the nearest to dead you’ll ever be save dying. Sleep is a patch of death, but three in the morn, full wide-eyed staring, is living death! You dream with your eyes open. God, if you had strength to rouse up, you’d slaughter your half-dreams with buckshot! But no, you lie pinned to a deep well-bottoom that’s burned dry. The moon rolls by to look at you down there, with its idiot face. It’s a long way back to sunset, a far way on to dawn, so you summon all the fool things of your life, the stupid lovely things down with people known so very well who are now so very dead – And wasn’t it true, had he read it somewhere, more people in hospitals die at 3 A.M. than any other time…?
‘Stop!’ he cried silently.
When you first read this, Paul Bryant, you were boys in this book. Given the chance you would have done everything they did. In your own way in your own life you probably were doing that. Either doing it or reading it, doesn’t matter. Now you are the man sleepless at 3am. I know you are that man and I know what it is like. You are still in the book, Paul. Charles haunts the library, you haunt goodreads. You’ve changed character but you can’t escape the story.
So, it is fantasy. We do have to suspend disbelief. Okay. I can do that, I had no issue whatsoever doing that this time around as I read most of this yesterday, pretty much unable to put it down, as I did first time, fourteen year old, girl not boy, so only watching, not doing those things. Glad, to be straightforwardly honest, that I don’t have to do those things.
So it is poetry in prose. Reading poetry now is an unfashionable activity to say the least. It doesn’t sit easily with cynicism. But actually, we don’t have to be cynics. It may be fashionable, but it isn’t compulsory.
So it DOES say this. That laughter beats wickedness. Is this a romantic notion? I hardly think so. I couldn’t imagine a more practical way of fighting that fight.
This is not to say that the story here is anything other than romantic. Of course it is. Is THAT bad? Elsewhere here I’ve quoted this, from an interview with Bradbury, but it is SO important:
By giving romance and adventure to a whole generation of boys, Burroughs caused them to go out and decide to become special. That’s what we have to do for everyone, give the gift of life with our books. Say to a girl or boy at age ten, Hey, life is fun! Grow tall! I’ve talked to more biochemists and more astronomers and technologists in various fields, who, when they were ten years old, fell in love with John Carter and Tarzan and decided to become something romantic. Burroughs put us on the moon. All the technologists read Burroughs. I was once at Caltech with a whole bunch of scientists and they all admitted it. Two leading astronomers—one from Cornell, the other from Caltech—came out and said, Yeah, that’s why we became astronomers. We wanted to see Mars more closely.
I find this in most fields. The need for romance is constant, and again, it’s pooh-poohed by intellectuals. As a result they’re going to stunt their kids. You can’t kill a dream. Social obligation has to come from living with some sense of style, high adventure, and romance.
Paul. It isn’t Bradbury’s fault, your review. It isn’t even the world’s fault. It’s yours. You don’t have to be the person who wrote that review. And I rather suspect that you aren’t.