Anil’s Ghost by Michael Ondaatje

Not for the first time, one observes how much more meaningful is description of horror in the hands of the fiction writer than in those of the statistician. From this point of view, the novel has won. I feel impelled to read about the history of Sri Lanka, about which I am completely ignorant.

I did, however, abandon the novel half way through. Ondaatje’s descriptions of the setting are all one would expect of a skilled writer who is himself Sri Lankan. But the story line is almost non-existent, at least at the half way point of the book, and the main character both bored and irritated me. Maybe Ondaatje can’t do girls?

All in all, this one gets a gong and I can’t say that I’m tempted to pick up anything else by him. Is that too negative of me?

Added later: I mistrust novels that have too much potential for filler. This one has two filler angles, one being the Sri Lankan wars and the other the details of reconstruction/identification of a skeleton. If these issues take up two-thirds of a book, it means that you don’t need a robust story or even characters. Well, you do, actually. But these sorts of novels seem to hope that the reader won’t notice that. Others may have been adequately beguiled, but I wasn’t.

3 thoughts on “Anil’s Ghost by Michael Ondaatje

  1. think you have to be in the right frame of mind for him – I disliked this at first, but then , a year or so later, liked it. Hope you like the Munro and Davis..

    • Hello Alan 🙂 I am prepared to believe I may like him another time, as you say. I am always rather suspicious of novels like this one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s