The Beastly Beatitudes of Balthazar B. by JP Donleavy

Once a darling of the literary world due to his first novel, The Ginger Man, he is now of that period, only old enough to be out of fashion, and I don’t know if he’ll get to be classic. I was put off Donleavy long ago by failing at my attempt to read The Ginger Man and then later by failing also with The Unexpurgated Code: A Complete Manual of Survival & Manners.

Late last year, however, I went to an English booksale in Geneva, which had the following rule: once you had 30CHF of books in your bag,Ā  you could continue to fill your bag with books at no further charge. I have not been buying books at fairs and fetes and sales and op shops since I could walk to no effect. Stuffing books in bags? It is a skill I could put on my CV. Knowing the rules of the game, I bought various books that otherwise would not have made the cut and this was one of them.

Evidently somebody had died and his books had been donated to the sale. He was clearly a man of literary taste and I hated to see so many of his books just sitting right at the end of the sale, not the sort of thing read these days. Hrrrrumph. There I was, therefore, practically obliged to take this book, by a writer with whom I had no affinity. I wanted it to have a home.

Twenty or so pages into the book, my opinion had not wavered, my previous judgement of him more or less confirmed. I might have stopped reading….but I didn’t. And suddenly things turned around. Far from wanting to stop, I couldn’t put it down.

The fact is one might criticise this, and perhaps others of his, since I gather Donleavy tends to write about the same thing, for various 21st century crimes. His hero, a tragic hero no less, is a young rich white male. One feels the misogyny of Donleavy and a patronising of ‘the lower classes’ which goes with his image. He bought a big country house in Ireland and dressed in the outlandish way Balthazar does.

And his comic pieces, which are oddly thrust into the book here and there, once they are set in Ireland, are coarse caricatures. The harridan of a wife, who sets upon her husband and young women, who sees the merest thought of sex as rape. Really? Now we would think like this: that these poor women were divided into those who had to keep becoming pregnant with all the attendant risks and the ones so young they didn’t yet understand those risks.

But then I think of the Irish couple I used to know, the tough woman with her eye fixed on her husband, the fact that it was with good reason, since he had lust perpetually in his face, though he may always have been too scared to act upon it.

And in any case, with the bulk of the book lyrically, if harrowingly sad, perhaps these pieces of silliness were essential to provide some balance.

Here we are, then, expected to laugh at things which are inappropriate to laugh at these days, and expected to feel sorry….for a rich, handsome, young white male? That’s really challenging the reader. It reminds me of a musician I used to go to see in Melbourne. He used to rant at his audience about how hard it was being part of this minority, the rich white male. The ‘rich’ seemed particularly obscene for him to complain about because he performed with a longtime member of the live folk scene in Melbourne, who had not a cent to his name. Errrm. Give all your money to Pete? We’d all be better off?

So here we have the hero of this book, Balthazar, a beautiful soft fearful young filthy-rich white male. Women fall for him like flies, but he is too paralysed with his fearfulness to be able to take advantage of this. In the entire book, over a long period of years, he has almost no sex. And he experiences almost no love.

He has all the get up and go of something small which has been squashed almost to death, perhaps by a copy of this very book. He has even less initiative and when he does, on rare occasion, exercise it, disaster befalls. If you ask me, such a person should make you so jolly irritated that you want to throw the darn book at the wall. And why on earth should you waste one moment of that shrinking number of moments you have left feeling sorry for him?

Ah, but you do. The fact is that there isn’t one moment in the book when you don’t feel for him. Somehow, despite all his natural advantages, despite his almost slothful approach to the world, despite his complete failure at any time to see any point to existence, despite all of that, you don’t want to box him around the ears whilst yelling at him to get real and wise up.

And it seems to me, that there is some aspect of genius at work, affecting the reader in a way where their very digestive system is wreaked havoc upon by the words of Donleavy, the order in which he puts them, and that way he has. Just google ‘Donleavy and ‘staccato’ to see the common observation-come-criticism that his delivery is staccato. But nothing could be further from the truth. The remarkable thing about this way – I wouldn’t want to use such a cold word as technique – of Donleavy is that although many of his sentences are not proper at all, but merely parts of sentences, they have a lilting, lyric quality of – well, one might say poetry there, but in fact it is much more complicated than that. I’ve tried to read this book out loud, thinking that it demanded to be, but no. So far my conclusion is that although it seems like it should be read aloud, in fact that is impossible to do and give justice to the words and their order. I’m fairly sure that this is not my fault for being an inadequate interpreter (though I may be). Rather, it is remarkably hard to read this book except in your head. I wonder if others have thought about this? I’d love to know if my idea about this is right or wrong.

To show what it’s like, this strange hypnotic prose, but at the same time to have this doubt, that to take a passage will reduce the very thing I’m trying to expose. Still. Take this, for instance. There is a context. The war which has ended. His abject loneliness. His constant yearning and complete inability to address that.

Balthazar B sat down on a crimson seat beneath a strained glass window and perused this oriental menu. The black dressed waitress brought a large cup of coffee and plate of glistening brown topped currant buns. A dish of gold balls of butter. A woman with a priest. Two red coated girls with refined small fingers sticking out form their cups of tea. Little clanks of cutlery on the glass. Heaped pots of sugar pieces. Warm fragrant coffee in the mouth. To open an evening newspaper and read that a cow escaped onto a road and gave the garda a wild chase into a village where the beast entered a public house and set the occupants to holding their pints high over their heads so as not to have them spilled. A wondrous simple peace. Without years of lonely grey. And upturned rafters in brick debris. With bombs and cannons chattering up against the night and searchlights waving over a terror torn sky.

To walk back down again this bustling street. The shop lights go on. A sweet smoky air descends. My drop of dew on a blade of grass. Is my gladness. Hovering above the ground.

High and still
Sparkling so
In Dublin

And that thing he does, slipping from third to first person. Marvellous.

12 thoughts on “The Beastly Beatitudes of Balthazar B. by JP Donleavy

  1. Cathy, how do you craft these reviews, so fun to read in themselves, not to mention how they make me yearn to read the books, such as this one?

    As you mentioned, I, too, go back to books and authors that I have seemingly disliked in my first approach, and also to books that are not that well known or liked, -by me or others-.

    The passage you quoted, -read after your enticing review-, stood up as brilliant! There’s a peculiar pleasure found in books and authors that have fallen out of grace, or that, though of quality, never rose to the category of well established classics at a major scale.

    I can brag about the same skill of packing books in brown bags! I do this much less now, but all my years teaching the girls, were spent at library sales, book sales of all kinds, -homes, stores-, and for a few of those years, I sold vintage children books from those sales at Etsy to finance the purchase of more books, šŸ™‚

    This just reminded me of Knut Hamsun. I guess we are reading him again, somehow, because of his descend to, in the words of Wikipedia, almost madness, and extreme poverty. And he was awarded the Nobel Price too. But he’s still marked by his allegiance to the Nazi regime. It’s something our modern physiques can’t forget. I’m not advocating to ignore this, it’s just that a person is a person, a writer is a writer, we don’t understand ‘context’, -context that is always going to contain one malady, moral fault, or several-. There’s still value to the artistic work of these overtly tainted authors, value that can be acknowledged without acquiescing to the person’s political, religious, moral and personal views.

    In one word, these days we judge the person before trying to read, watch or hear to her art. But I’m glad you find the value among the biases and bigoted preconceptions. I rather read a book such as this, than modern pabulum.

    • It is so hard, reading about authors, they are often utterly repugnant. I try not to do it. To date I have only read Hunger – my report, which is way overstating what it is: and Mysteries, with which I struggled as you can see:

      As you can see, I did know a little about him, it’s hard to escape.

      I hope you had good experiences selling children’s books. For my family business, it definitely gave most pleasure. Nothing like an 80 year old writing to you to ask if you have a book ‘it had a palm tree in it, and I think there was a dog’ or some such, they were parted from it 70 years ago and would like to be reunited. We were amazed how often we could take unlikely hints and discover exactly what they were looking for!

  2. I’ll come back to read both reviews. (I’ve only read Looking Back to Happiness by Hamsun, and found it odd). Honestly, I didn’t see anything politically wrong, it was an off feeling from his treatment of ‘others’, or his perception of ‘others’. It was an interesting book to read, though, but agree, these authors are often repugnant, that’s the word.

    I had BEAUTIFUL experiences selling children’s books, -and in the meanwhile, buying our own and reading them to my daughters-. It’s a sweet time of our life. I’m not surprised on how you managed to go from a couple of unlikely hints to the exact book they longed for at the dawn of life. That made my day, to hear that memory.

  3. I just read both reviews and, your first one, I don’t know how Hunger reads, but his Looking back on happiness brought a similar experience, I couldn’t stop reading it, but I couldn’t make sense of it. Yes. Something was wrong with him, ha ha ha.

    Your second review made me laugh hard! Oh, how many times I’ve had the same feeling. What do others see in this book? Why don’t I get this author?, and I have no bone enough to move on. Is it an Emperor’s New Clothes scenario?, or do I think that because my pride is hurt for not completing or getting much of a book that others of great taste and skill rave about?

    Oh, well. LOL.

    • šŸ™‚ My biggest hurdle I have to try to get over is James Joyce. I have an illustrated edition of The Dubliners and I must pick it up and give it a try. I’m glad I’m not the only one that has these struggles, which are with ego as much as with anything.

      • If we prepare, we should be able to like all these authors, the thing to me is, do I want to devote this much time? I have Proust in line, but it’s going to be effort, and I can’t commit now.

  4. Holy nostalgia Cathy.I read the Beatitudes shortly after returning from a tour of Europe,many many years ago.I stayed with a friend in the residences at Trinity College and reading Donleavy was deju vu.Trinity and the rooms was exactly as depicted.This was a wonderful thoughtful review,and I think a reread ins in order.Thanks for the visit back.By the way,the other book you mentioned was called The Ginger Man,here in Canada.

    • John, I will be the first to admit that I’m food obsessed and so I had ‘Gingerbread Man’ to begin with because I was in denial. What was the point of a Ginger Man if he weren’t stamped out on a piece of dough? Then I fixed it in the actual post very quickly, but too late for Feeds I guess. Feeds. Food. Again. We are all lucky that this blog isn’t just a collection of recipe books.

      All the detail of the book rings true. Love that, so I’m glad to hear it is in keeping!

  5. I very much enjoyed your review, particularly as I’m unfamiliar with Donleavy’s work (I now plan on checking him out!) I loved the passage you quoted; it made me see what you meant about Donleavy’s language. There’s a definite rhythm to it, which gives it a poetic quality. It’s also incredibly evocative and very, very sensual (those “gold balls of butter” and those “glistening brown topped currant buns”), which increases the effect of poetry.
    P.S. I’m impressed by your book packing skills!

    • ‘P.S. Iā€™m impressed by your book packing skills!’ šŸ™‚ My parents were really good at getting the most book into the smallest area!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s