A Season on Earth by Gerald Murnane

It was a shock, coming to this from Murnane’s first, Tamarisk Row. Not that there aren’t ongoing themes, young male experience, Roman Catholicism, gambling, isolation from culture. But this one is very focussed on the teenage boy and therefore on sex: how it fits in with RC and gambling is the overarching story of A Season on Earth. I do wonder if people now can read this, especially since Roman Catholicism is so marginal to life in Anglo-Saxon countries, not least here in Australia. The shock, though, is the style. Where Tamarisk Row was a struggle – pleasurable, but nonetheless difficult – A Season on Earth is easy. If you don’t want to read a lot about Roman Catholicism and the teenage boy’s relationship with it, this book is not for you. But there is always humour, or something approaching humour there, it is not a story of dour epiphany. Recalling my primary school attempts to fast-track sainthood whilst avoiding any pain, which involved much research to find saints who had nice lives (needles in a haystack), it was easy to empathise with the young protagonist’s attempts to negotiate the facts of a teenager’s desires, if not urges, with his supposed religious feeling. It’s here that the gambling comes out and that involves deal-making with God, another RC habit which will be familiar to those brought up in that unkind religion.

Still shaking my head about this one and have put it on my ‘I’m moving on but I can’t get you out of my mind’. Perhaps that’s a recommendation to read it.

 

Magpie by Peter Goldsworthy and Brian Matthews

Not one of my GR friends has read this! Not one person on GR has reviewed it. It’s an even worse cold-shouldering than Australian books get in general and I’m guessing that’s because it has the wrong number of authors. Don’t let that put you off, this is a hilarious short novel – I would have called it a novella, but I guess that’s the kiss of marketing death along with joint authorship.

Spoilers follow.

Should you happen to be an Adelaide person, then the particulars of the university merger will seem somewhat prescient. I loved the description of the military influence on the merger – no doubt this is the case, some 32 years later as it actually unfolds. Oh, and the tone of the book has it all just right. Apparently it is no accident that in the real world now, the joint committee calls their get-togethers the Future University meetings. Magpie gets the FU tone perfect. Talk about crystal ball.

But this is just a small aside in the book. The major theme is writing and publishing, and in this case, I think it’s better to stay schtum, other than to say it’s clever, witty, and if you have ever wondered if fictional characters should have rights, then this is the book for you. Highly recommended.

Women Falling Down in the Street by Kate Jennings

Kate Jennings is one of those authors I intend to work my way through, but it’s easier said than done. Even Snake, which is more or less an Australian classic and had a commercial publisher, is hard to get hold of.

It may be problematic with this collection that they seem simple, but aren’t. Being, however, easy to read, that can escape one’s notice. They also feel intensely personal, like they come from the author’s life but she doesn’t want to say so. I’m undecided, after the dazzling Moral Hazard, what to make of this lot. I think ‘Observations’ would be a better description of the pieces that ‘Stories’.

Tamarisk Row by Gerald Murnane

I’d forgotten that horse racing and gambling on it were once such an endemic part of Australian life. My own upbringing, like the protagonist’s in this story, was RC and poor. Like his mother, mine was virulently anti-gambling. And like his father, mine was addicted to ‘the races’, as they were always called. In the case of my father, this was despite the stories he would tell of those around him, including his own brothers, being unable to afford warm coats in winter because all their money went on feeding the bookies. The difference, however, was that my mother wouldn’t let my father do it ‘for work’, in that way Augustine justifies his relentless losses, and so almost all my father’s bets were purely theoretical….in that way Augustine’s are when he ‘stops’.

Thank heavens my mother held her ground on this. She herself had experienced anguish at the hands of the ‘industry’. Her very decent father suddenly died when she was at the end of primary school, forcing my grandmother to make ends meet for her four daughters and herself by opening a fruit and veg shop. Unfortunately her very decent dead husband had a brother who was quite the opposite. He ran an SP booking racket using my grandma’s shop as the front. Eventually it was raided and there was a most upright, decent, God-fearing sort of woman up before the courts, taking the blame for her brother-in-law. Perhaps the memory of this was partly to account for my mother’s attitudes, but in any case, she would also have been well aware of what happens to the families of those who decide that they are brighter than the trainers and the bookies and the big punters with their scams.

I never lived in small town rural Australia, but every Australian has been through them, they have felt the glazed heat, understood what the local pool means, seen the still smallness of such places. The aloneness that creates the rich imaginary life of small children like Clement. Because others drink with the consequent brutal behaviour as well as bet, his father Augustine sees the extreme poverty through which he puts his family as somehow more acceptable, superior perhaps. However sorry we feel for Clement, we know there is far worse, within the walls of the story and without.

Murnane has both the knowledge that comes of his own fascination with the horses and the understanding, I suppose born from a capacity to stand outside himself, to see it for what it is. Again, it was incredibly evocative for me. There is a moment when Augustine is regretting not the amount he has lost – that is never a source of regret for compulsive gamblers – but the amount he has won. It brought to mine my friend B. with whom I was flatting. We were part of a community which saw itself as a group of pro betters, this was back before computers made ordinary people able to compete. My friends were all numbers people. Some of them were dedicated professional winners. But some, and B. was one, were mere addicts. B. always made sure he paid his rent and his health insurance, but other than that, it was all for the horses. Or rather, for the people who won from people like him. One work day (as the horse betters saw Saturdays) I heard he’d won a lot of money, it was around 30K. I called him and said the kind of things you say at such a moment. But he was sad, just like Augustine was sad with such a win. Addicts think not of what they did win, but of what they didn’t. It was the one they should have had the house on. It was the first time I really felt pity for B. He couldn’t win, even if he won.

This world of horse betting is dying in Australia. Partly this is because there are so many ways to part addicts with their money these days. But it’s also because horse racing is seen as bad for the animals involved. Gone is the culture of Melbourne Cup day, a day which unofficially served as a national holiday throughout the land. My mother, harking back to the period when this book was set, recalled the big hall at Wayville in which school and university exams were held. At the time the race started, pens were downed, the radio put on, and for ten minutes all in the hall were transported to a different place. Murnane has preserved an Australia which is dying, not only because of the horse races, but because drinking has changed, isolation has changed, attitudes have changed.

Some years back the NYT predicted a Nobel prize for him and I can understand why. By the time I was a few dozen pages into Tamarisk Row, I went back to Imprints and bought another eight by him that they had in stock. I haven’t started my next yet because I found this one deeply painful. Not only because of the horse racing, but also because it dragged up memories of the brutality of Roman Catholicism as we children experienced it in that period. Oh, and we can add gender relations into the mix as well. But above all its precise exquisiteness hurt like needles being placed in just the right positions.

Maybe it’s a book to love, rather than to like. But don’t let that put you off reading it.

Candelo by Georgia Blain

None of the characters are likable, and I don’t blame those who think it’s too slow and repetitive: it’s definitely that. To make matters worse, the denouement is very obvious from early on. But despite that, I always wanted to keep going. Maybe part of the point of the book is that human beings are repetitive, set in our ways, never really changing. That applies even to the mother who starts off married to a male lawyer and ends up in a relationship with another female. That woman wants to change her, but fat chance says the daughter who knows better.

The bottom line is that I’ve already bought a couple more Blains to read and I hope they get better not worse.

The List of All Answers Collected Stories by Peter Goldsworthy

Doctors who write (fiction) is a category in itself. It isn’t just that they can very convincingly have doctorly details in their stories, whether that be how a heart attack looks, or what happens when a doctor opens up in competition across the road. It’s also a different way of looking at everything, a combination of high level diagnosis and fine dissection. Love these short short-stories, they’ve made me wonder if really he should stick to that length rather than novels. There’s never one of those reader moments where you think you can skip the rest of this one and get away with it. And yet another novel of his is in my to-read pile and I’m bound to favour it.

 

 

Moral Hazard by Kate Jennings

When I finished this, couldn’t put it down, read it greedily, trying not to be, I thought my review would be one word.

Perfect.

But then I looked around and saw somewhat disparaging reviews on GR – not a lot of them, but enough – and it made me want to add a few more words.

Dudes. What the fuck is wrong with youse.

As the Australian vernacular has it.

I tried to have the two lives Kate Jennings has in this ‘novel’ memoir. The one where you are totally dedicated to person who has the all-encompassing vulnerability of dementia, while doing the dedicated job too and hats off to her for making that work. She writes about it in the spare, beautiful way of the poet. She makes two really shitty things utterly engaging in their repulsiveness, the day-to-day breaking down of her husband, and the gross world of Wall St. I know a lot of people who work on a Wall St – whether it’s in NY, or London, or Sydney, doesn’t really matter, the people are the same, the sociopathic immorality, their capacity to do such wrong, whilst pretending it’s the best for us. And she nails that. There isn’t a word in her descriptions of either of her worlds which is out of place.

Seriously, hats fucking right off dudes. Standing ovation while you are about it.

 

 

 

 

Everything I Knew by Peter Goldsworthy

I’ve been mulling over this for several weeks now partly because I wish I knew just how uneasy the author wants us to feel. Are we really not supposed to see the boy of the ‘I’ in the title as a rapist? Would I have felt as concerned about it when it first came out in 2008? Would I feel as discomforted by it if I were a man?

In a nub, Miss Peach is a newcomer to town, a country school teacher who has a married admirer come to visit her. At her place she gets very drunk and at some point believes that she is having sex (first time for her) with this poet. But in fact one of her students has broken into the house, hidden under her bed, comes out after the poet leaves, and then it is he who rapes her. Well, I don’t see what else to call it. But apparently there are other ways….

Peter Pierce calls the key scene: ‘Episodes of the most uproarious bedroom farce in Australian fiction’

Seriously? I know it’s over ten years since it was written and we have different attitudes to consent now, but still. Surely a woman would have a different attitude. But when I look around, I see that at that time the female reviewers had no issue with this. Lisa Hill refers to ‘The catastrophe that befalls Miss Peach as a result of her inexperience with booze is of a different order, but no less devastating.’ But she was raped by somebody who broke into her house. Thank heavens things have changed if in 2009 this would be described as her fault, in effect.

I hated the older lesbian couple, they were overdone caricatures and unnecessary to the story; really, there was too much in the story. But lots of it was good. Although some are critical of the SF stories which abound, I liked them a lot. The relationship with his indigenous friend rang true – and does the central character no favours as Robbie behaves abominably towards him.

Maybe in the end one could say that this novel is problematic on various levels but I never wanted to stop reading it. I suppose that means something. And despite the book’s dubious attitude to the sexual assault on the teacher, Robbie is never portrayed as nice, and is never given a break, his life remains without happiness. The other thing that bothers me, though, is that he never has any insight into what he did, which led to the death of the teacher, to include another major spoiler. The reason much later on as an adult, he wishes Miss Peach were still alive, is his continued capacity to see a relationship when there was none. He thinks that it would have turned out differently if only she hadn’t gone and killed herself. I don’t know what to say.